Supreme Court Seems Ready to Allow Cross Honoring War Dead

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready on Wednesday to allow a 40-foot cross honoring soldiers who died in World War I to remain in place on public land in Maryland.

But the unusually vigorous and at times heated argument over the issue revealed deep divisions among the justices on the more general question of what role religion may play in public life.

A majority of the justices appeared inclined to rule that the particular cross at issue in the case, which is part of a memorial to 49 fallen soldiers from Prince George’s County, did not run afoul of the First Amendment’s ban on government establishment of religion by sending a message of favoritism to Christianity.

Justice Elena Kagan noted that the memorial was 93 years old and was erected at a time when crosses were a common way to honor the fallen in the Great War. She added that other war memorials stood nearby and that the challenged memorial did not feature religious language.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer also stressed the memorial’s age. “History counts,” he said. But he suggested that the erection of a similar memorial today would not be acceptable. “We’re a different country now,” he said.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg appeared skeptical. “It is the pre-eminent symbol of Christianity,” she said of the cross.

Other justices said the court should use its decision in what might appear to be a relatively easy case to clarify its confusing jurisprudence on the separation of church and state, which Justice Neil M. Gorsuch called “a dog’s breakfast.”

The eventual decision is likely to feature competing rationales for upholding the cross, which sits on a highway median at a busy intersection in Bladensburg, in the suburbs of Washington.

It was completed in 1925 using contributions from local families and the American Legion. The state took over the monument and the land under it in 1961. Since then, the state has spent more than $117,000 to maintain and repair the memorial.

The American Humanist Association and several area residents sued to remove the cross in 2014, saying they were offended by what they said was its endorsement of Christianity.

A divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., ruled that the cross sent an unconstitutional message of government approval of a particular religion, breaching the wall between church and state. The full Fourth Circuit declined to rehear the case by an 8-to-6 vote.

Source

more recommended stories

  • $1 Billion for Mental Health: The Reality of de Blasio’s ‘Revolutionary’ Plan

    [What you need to know to.

  • The Fight to Tame a Swelling River With Dams That May Be Outmatched by Climate Change

    Want climate news in your inbox?.

  • ‘Florida Is Tired of Being a Cheap Date’: Andrew Gillum Wants to Help Democrats Win in 2020

    Andrew Gillum has more free time.

  • Report Says U.S. Airstrikes Have Killed 14 Civilians in Somalia

    WASHINGTON — For years, the Pentagon.

  • On C-Span’s 40th Anniversary, a Top Executive Reflects on Its Political Impact

    Forty years ago, C-Span went live.

  • Trump Renews Attacks on John McCain, Months After Senator’s Death

    WASHINGTON — Tucked between St. Patrick’s.

  • After 2 Crashes of New Boeing Jet, Pilot Training Now a Focus

    The chief executive of Boeing backed.

  • On Politics: The Biggest Stories of the Week

    Meanwhile, candidates’ moves to the left.

  • In Beto O’Rourke’s Announcement, His Wife’s Silence Stands Out

    Beto O’Rourke, the charismatic Texas Democrat.

  • Mnuchin Vows to Protect Trump’s Privacy if Tax Returns Sought

    WASHINGTON — Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury.

  • Trump on Tech: Planes Are ‘Too Complex to Fly,’ and ‘What Is Digital?’

    WASHINGTON — He prefers Sharpies over.

  • Congress Warns Against Medicaid Cuts: ‘You Just Wait for the Firestorm’

    WASHINGTON — If President Trump allows.

  • ‘Airbnb Tax’ in N.J. Opens New Front in Battle Over Internet Economy

    [What you need to know to.

  • In Unusual Move, Fox News Condemns Jeanine Pirro’s Remarks on Muslim Legislator

    In an unusual reproach, Fox News.

  • Netanyahu-Trump Partnership Is Stronger Than Ever. Are These Its Final Days?

    What was missing with Mr. Trump,.

  • New Images of North Korea Buildup Confront Trump’s Hopes for Disarmament

    WASHINGTON — President Trump was forced.

  • On Politics: The Biggest Stories of the Week

    From the president’s checks to a.

  • Chelsea Manning Is Jailed for Refusing to Testify in WikiLeaks Case

    WASHINGTON — Chelsea Manning, the former.

  • When Foreign Leaders Send Presidents a Gift, Flattery is Usually a Theme

    Foreign officials also appear to have.

  • On Politics: Trade Deficit Hits Record $891 Billion

    • Trade talks between the United.

  • U.S. and E.U. Are Headed for a Food Fight Over Trade

    WASHINGTON — After a White House.

  • House’s Anti-Semitism Resolution Surfaces Generational Fight Over Ilhan Omar

    WASHINGTON — The decision by House.

  • Roger Stone Faces Questions Over Whether He Violated Gag Order

    The former Trump adviser Roger Stone.

  • On Politics: Behind the Failed Trump-Kim Summit

    President Trump made a bet that.

  • On Politics: The Biggest Stories of the Week

    From Michael Cohen’s testimony to the.

  • Manafort’s Lawyers, Saying He Learned ‘Harsh Lesson,’ Seek Lenient Sentence

    WASHINGTON — Lawyers for Paul Manafort,.

  • On Politics: Trump Ordered Kushner’s Security Clearance

    • Mr. Trump declared on Thursday.

  • What to Watch For in Thursday’s G.D.P. Report

    After a monthlong delay because of.

  • Biden’s Family Is Urging Him to Run in 2020

    NEWARK, Del. — Former Vice President.

  • Paul Manafort’s Lawyers Argue He Has Been Unfairly ‘Vilified’ Before Sentencing

    WASHINGTON — Lawyers for Paul Manafort,.

  • How Lindsey Graham Went From Trump Skeptic to Trump Sidekick

    I asked Graham if he considered.

  • 40-Foot Cross Divides a Community and Prompts a Supreme Court Battle

    BLADENSBURG, Md. — In the back.